February, 2016 | Begin the Begin

Identity Theft and the IRS

February 22, 2016

Many of you may have seen that the IRS was hacked again recently and personal data was compromised. My partner, Wayne Zell, was one such victim and he recently blogged about his arduous experience of proving who he was to the IRS once he received a letter from them.

Unfortunately, his experience is becoming all too common. Another partner, Eric Horvitz, also recently had an experience in which he received robot calls on his cell phone supposedly from the IRS telling him that he would be sued within days unless he returned the call. Although Eric knew it was a scam, he was curious and returned the call using his office phone and was asked to provide personal information. Once the person on the other end of the line knew that Eric understood this was a scam, the person hung up. Eric then provided the following valuable reminders:

The IRS will never initially contact you by phone. You will first receive a letter. If you paid all of your taxes for a prior tax year, then a legitimate letter from the IRS likely will say that your tax return is being audited in some fashion. If you did not pay all of your taxes for a prior tax year, then a legitimate letter from the IRS likely will be a bill that requests payment. Your failure to address an initial IRS letter in a timely fashion will result with a follow up letter from the IRS in some fashion.
If after receiving a letter (or likely letters) from the IRS, the IRS does call you. The IRS employee always will provide his name and should give his IRS employee number. Ask what office the IRS is calling you from and later verify that the given IRS office does exist. A legitimate phone call from the IRS likely means that you have ignored all prior letters from the IRS. The person calling you likely is either a “revenue agent” – the IRS employee who will audit your return – or a “revenue officer” – the IRS employee who will demand payment.
The IRS will never call you threatening to sue you. Again, you always will get some sort of letter in the mail.
Never call these scam artists back. They are out to get your personal information in any way and your money. Simply by calling them back on the telephone number on which they called you will give them a source of information with which they can steal your identity.
The IRS neither asks nor requires you to use a specific payment method for your taxes, such as a prepaid debit card – the 21^st century version of cash — which likely will have no origin through the banking system.
The IRS will never threaten that the “police” will arrest you. The IRS does have its own police officers. They are called “special agents.” If you are contacted by a special agent, then you likely will know why the IRS has contacted you. In that case, tell the special agent to have a nice day and also tell him that your attorney will contact the special agent. Then, get an attorney. You will need one.

As if matters are not already difficult when dealing with the theft of your own identity, for those who have recently lost loved ones and are having to deal with filing final tax returns, the process has become even more complex because of the amount of identity fraud. It is not uncommon for a fraudulent tax return to be filed using a deceased person’s social security number that claims any refund. Usually, executors do not know it has happened until they go to file the final tax return and their filing is rejected.

The process for undoing the damage of the stolen identity can and will take months to resolve. Because there has been so much fraud, the IRS has started responding to requests for information about a deceased’s person’s tax returns with a letter indicating that they will not provide any such information until the executor (or perhaps the CPA or attorney) calls and proves the executor has authority to ask for and receive the tax information. The call alone can take hours with you just sitting on hold.

There are ways that you can notify the IRS of your authority as an executor through particular IRS forms that are filed with the IRS. An experienced estate and trust administration attorney or CPA can guide you through that process and help complete the forms and get them filed in the proper order. The hope in submitting the IRS forms is that you can avoid hours lost on hold with the IRS and prevent fraudulent filings that create stress during any already stressful time after a loved one has died.

Ultimately, whether you are having to deal with identity theft or fraud involving the IRS at a personal level or as an executor, you should consider speaking with a tax professional, such as a CPA or an attorney. #taxplanning #identitytheft #IRSfraud #estateadministration

Why Has Income Tax Planning Become a Bigger Part of Estate Planning?

February 17, 2016

Many of you may have had your estate plan prepared at a time when the exemptions from Federal estate tax were much lower and the ability to use a deceased spouse’s exemption was unavailable. To ensure that a married couple maximized the use of the available exemptions, your estate plan may have been structured so that upon the death of one spouse, two subtrusts were automatically created for the benefit of the surviving spouse.

As discussed in an earlier post, the estate tax laws have changed and exemptions from Federal estate tax were permanently set at higher levels. In addition, married couples are permitted to transfer any unused Federal estate tax exemption to a surviving spouse by way of a concept known as ‘portability.’ Thus, the need for an automatic allocation between two subtrusts upon the death of one spouse is no longer necessary in certain circumstances and may have unintended income tax consequences as follows.

As you may know, upon the death of one spouse, the tax basis in certain assets owned by that spouse is adjusted to the fair market value as of the date of death. This adjustment is often referred to as a “step-up” or “step-down” in basis. Assets funded into the subtrusts will receive a basis adjustment on the death of the first spouse. Upon the death of the surviving spouse, only assets held in one of the subtrusts (i.e., the Marital Trust) will be adjusted to the fair market value as of the date of death of the surviving spouse. The assets of the other subtrust (i.e., Credit Shelter or Bypass Trust) continue with the same tax basis that was received upon the death of the first spouse. Therefore, the beneficiaries under your estate plan after both of you are gone may pay more in capital gains tax on any assets held in the subtrusts if automatic allocation is made between the subtrusts and the assets appreciate in value after the date of death of the first spouse.

To provide maximum flexibility to the family following the death of the first spouse, you should consider amending your estate plan to remove the automatic allocation and having all the assets pass to one subtrust. The surviving spouse would then have the ability to reallocate (i.e., disclaim) a portion of the assets, if necessary, but the reallocation would be made after evaluating both the income tax and estate tax situation at that time.

Realizing this may be a lot to digest, the main point is that if you have not recently reviewed your estate plan, you should do so to see if any changes need to be made. Rest assured that any change would be implemented only after collaboration and concurrence of all of your advisors (i.e., your financial advisors, your accountant and your attorney). #estateplanning #taxplanning #incometaxplanning #portability #estateplanupdate

ALERT – New Rules for Basis Consistency

February 13, 2016

If you are an executor of an estate or an advisor to such executor, then you need to be aware of two new statutes that may impact you and a change in the initial deadline. Included in the Surface Transportation and Veterans Health Care Choice Improvement Act that was effective on July 31, 2015, were two statutes that require the executor of an estate to report to the IRS and to the beneficiaries of the estate the basis (in this case, fair market value of the asset that is determined after a death) of the assets that the beneficiaries are to receive from the estate.

Section 1014(f) requires that the basis the beneficiary receives be consistent with the value as reported on the estate tax return. Section 6035 is the reporting requirement on new Form 8971. Under Section 6035, executors are required to provide certain information on Form 8971 to beneficiaries no later than the earlier of (a) 30 days after the estate tax return was due (taking into account any extensions), or (b) 30 days after the estate tax return is filed. In Notice 2015-57, effective on August 21, 2015, the initial deadline for such reporting was extended to February 29, 2016 to allow for the promulgation of regulations.

On February 11, 2016, Notice 2016-19 was released in which the initial deadline was further extended to March 31, 2016 to allow for more time to issue regulations relating to these new statutes. Among other items that are in need of clarification is whether an executor of an estate in which an estate tax return is only being filed to take advantage of portability needs to complete and file Form 8971. The recent Notice advises executors and others to not file Form 8971 until the release of the regulations, which are expected “very shortly.” Thus, executors and advisors remain in limbo in certain situations and will need to stay tuned for further updates. Furthermore, beneficiaries need to be aware that they will be receiving this information and will be responsible for maintaining accurate records. #estateadministration #taxplanning #basisconsistency #form8971

David Bowie’s Last Will and Testament – What Is to be Learned?

February 2, 2016

Last week David’s Bowie’s Last Will and Testament was filed in a New York Surrogate Court. We learned how he wanted to be remembered, a subject I addressed in an earlier post. We also learned how his considerable estate will be divided and about specific gifts he wanted to have made. But most importantly, we learned that having a Last Will and Testament as the main instrument that details the disposition of our estate does not ensure privacy regarding our personal and financial affairs after death. In fact, having a Last Will and Testament means that anyone can see who benefits from an estate and ensures the Court has to be involved at some level.

For some individuals, privacy may not be a priority issue after death, but for others privacy is tantamount. This is why when you think about your own estate plan you should ask – “What level of privacy in my personal and financial affairs do I want to achieve after my death?” If you want the utmost privacy, then consider using a Revocable Living Trust as the main instrument in which to dispose of your estate. If, however, there are problematic parties or other reasons to have the Court supervise the administration of your estate, then perhaps having only a Last Will and Testament to dispose of your estate is the path to take. But, you should consider who will have access to your estate plan and what will they learn as result. Either way, a thoughtful conversation with your professional advisor should be had as you begin constructing your estate plan. #davidbowieswill #estateplanning #revocabletrust #livingtrust