On June 3, 2020, the Paycheck Protection Program Flexibility Act of 2020 (PPP Flexibility Act) was unanimously approved by the Senate, after overwhelming approval by the House last week. Under the PPP Flexibility Act, which is expected to be signed into law by the President, the CARES Act was amended to provide additional flexibility to borrowers. The highest profile change is to the definition of “covered period,” which now shifts from eight weeks from loan origination to the earlier of 24 weeks or Dec. 31, 2020.
Learn more about the PPP Flexibility Act from Shareholder Michelle DiCintio by CLICKING HERE.
In an attempt to make chapter 11 more streamlined and less expensive for debtors, Congress amended the bankruptcy code to add a brand new reorganization chapter: Subchapter V. Subchapter V is available exclusively to small-business debtors and provides a new option that is intended to be quicker and cheaper; it also offers less oversight and fewer reporting requirements than a traditional chapter 11 case. Congress originally made the new Subchapter V option available to all businesses with $2.7 million or less in aggregate secured and unsecured non-contingent and liquidated debt. That amount was increased to $7.5 million for the rest of 2020 under the CARES Act.
Earlier this month the Small Business Administration (SBA) and Department of Treasury streamlined the path to applying for loan forgiveness under the Paycheck Protection Program (PPP), the lifeline extended to small businesses suffering financial pressures resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic. A revised loan forgiveness application and a new EZ version of the form are designed to slash the layers of paperwork, documentation and calculations required to request loan forgiveness. New instructions for Borrowers were also issued for both the Revised Form and the EZ Form.
Spring brought significant changes to Virginia’s employment law landscape. Virginia Governor Ralph Northam recently signed a series of new employee-centric laws, including the ones intended to fight against worker misclassification.
The latest from OFP attorneys regarding the impact of COVID-19 on commercial lease agreements.
Commercial Leases and COVID-19: Force Majeure, Frustration of Purpose, and Impossibility under the Laws of Virginia, Maryland, and the District of Columbia
As landlords and tenants in the DC Metro region navigate the COVID-19 climate and an unprecedented dip in the economy, provisions within commercial leases related to excusing nonperformance are being tested, and in some cases, for the first time. Force majeure clauses are front and center in the debate over excuses for nonperformance, opportunities for termination, and the allocation of liability. However, the common law doctrines of frustration of purpose and impossibility may also be applicable. This set of articles explores the defenses that may be available to commercial tenants in Virginia, Maryland, and the District of Columbia during the coronavirus pandemic, keeping in mind that in these unprecedented times, case law on the impact of the crisis is developing.
As has been much discussed, loan forgiveness is a key feature of the CARES Act’s Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) administered by the Small Business Administration (SBA), but there has been little guidance regarding the process and criteria for seeking forgiveness. Late Friday, May 15, 2020, the SBA and Department of Treasury released the PPP loan forgiveness application and related instructions, providing some clarity. Additionally, the Treasury Department indicated in an associated press release that the SBA will issue regulations and guidance to further assist borrowers in the completion of their applications for forgiveness, and provide lenders with guidance on their responsibilities. Learn more from OFP Shareholder Michelle DiCintio.
On May 13, 2020, the Small Business Administration (SBA) again updated its guidance regarding the safe harbor provision for loans disbursed under the Paycheck Protection Program (PPP), the lifeline extended to small businesses under the financial relief package known as the CARES Act. Learn more from OFP Shareholder Michelle DiCintio.
OFP’s COVID-19 Commercial Leasing Playbook
Although Northern Virginia, Maryland and DC are not fully ready to begin easing COVID-19 restrictions, business leaders are preparing now. What can landlords and tenants do today to survive a challenging second quarter, prepare for reopening, and emerge strong for the rest of 2020?
On July 1, 2020, the Virginia Values Act (VVA) will become effective as law and introduce new legal protections designed to make the Commonwealth a more accepting workplace for all members of society. In doing so, the VVA is expected to produce a sweeping overhaul of employment discrimination litigation in Virginia by prohibiting employment discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation, gender identity, and veteran status. These changes, unprecedented thus far in southern states, will significantly impact employers while providing additional protections and remedies to employees. Learn more from OFP Attorney Cameron Green.
The US Department of Labor (“DOL”) issued a notice that covered employers are required to share regarding the recently passed paid sick leave provisions. At present, the DOL is soliciting questions from employers and employees as the agency prepares to draft enabling regulations to address how to implement these paid-leave provisions. As shown by this solicitation for comments and questions, there are many open questions about how an employer is to respond to requests for coverage. Learn more here.
The Small Business Administration has relaxed requirements for small businesses whose operations have been disrupted by COVID-19. SBA Disaster Relief loans may be used to “…pay fixed debts, payroll, accounts payable and other bills that can’t be paid because of the disaster’s impact. The interest rate is 3.75% for small businesses. The interest rate for non-profits is 2.75%.” Read more here.
COVID-19 is creating unprecedented business disruptions around the globe, and it is important to take this situation seriously. Acting with urgency is crucial, but having a plan of attack will mitigate confusion down the road. Click here to learn more.
In an attempt to mitigate the unfolding COVID-19 public health emergency, state and local governments have started issuing “lockdown” or “stay-at-home” orders. Generally, the state lockdown orders have directed that all businesses utilize telecommuting or work-from-home procedures to the maximum extent practicable. Where telework is impractical, some states are only permitting essential businesses to remain open. Companies with operations in these jurisdictions must understand the scope of applicable restrictions and whether their operations are essential and should continue during the lockdown. Learn more from attorney Michelle DiCintio.
OFP Shareholder Shiva Hamidinia provides a run-down to help businesses determine whether they are deemed essential as the country works to maintain social distancing protocols to help stem the spread of COVID-19. Click here to learn more.
As COVID-19 continues to stir economic uncertainty, businesses are concerned about possible defaults under their credit facilities and some businesses may want to consider how they are using credit vehicles to support ongoing operations. Click here to learn more.
Businesses and individuals now will have until July 15th to file and pay their Federal income taxes. This means that you have an additional three months to plan and prepare your returns without having incurring penalties on up to $1 million in tax owed. Businesses will have the same period to pay amounts due on up to $10 million in tax owed. Learn more from attorney Catherine Schott Murray.
On March 18, 2020, the Families First Coronavirus Response Act was signed into law and will become effective not later than 15 days later, April 2, 2020. There are some differences between what was ultimately passed and what was summarized in our early article from March 16, 2020. Learn more from attorney Marina Blickley.
Construction and many other contractors who cannot telework may be receiving stop-work orders or facing other unique challenges on their government contracts in the face of COVID-19. Impacts may be exacerbated for personnel working in the field who may not be receiving guidance from the government due to unavailability of their Contracting Officers (CO) or Contracting Officer Representatives (COR). Learn more from attorney Shiva Hamidinia.
Out of an abundance of caution and with the utmost respect for our seniors and their caregivers, we have postponed the launch of our upcoming series, Real Talk: The Essentials of Aging with Confidence, until further notice.
We hope to proceed with our April session if it is prudent to do so. Be sure to watch for more information in the coming weeks.
This month we begin the first of a 3-part series in which we tackle topics involving The Essentials of Aging with Confidence. Details below including where to register. We look forward to seeing you there!
March 18th – Part 1: Getting Your Estate in Order April 22nd – Part 2: Aging in Place or Assisted Living? Which option works for your lifestyle? May 13th – Part 3: The Essential Guide to Aging and Caregiving. @bgnthebgn @ofplaw @sandyspringbank #shepherdscenter #agingwithconfidence
The end of the year is always a busy time of the year particularly in estate and tax planning. 2019 was no exception as on December 20th, the Setting Every Community Up for Retirement Enhancement Act (“the SECURE Act”) was signed into law. The SECURE Act took effect on January 1, 2020 and makes significant changes to qualified individual retirement account (“IRA”) planning, including the elimination of the stretch IRA for inherited IRAs, among other changes. Treasury Regulations have not yet been issued, so some of the details in the SECURE Act are still unknown and the gaps are not yet filled.
Before summarizing the elimination of the stretch IRA provisions, a few of the other key changes under the SECURE Act included the following:
The age for required minimum distributions (“RMDs”) to be drawn from retirement accounts is increased from 70 ½ to 72 years old.
The prohibition of retirement contributions after reaching 70 ½ is repealed.
Penalty-free withdrawals of up to $5,000 from retirement accounts to cover the costs of childbirth or adoption are permitted.
529 college savings plans can be used to cover the costs of apprenticeships and up to $10,000 can be withdrawn to help repay qualified student loans.
The pre-Tax Cuts and Jobs Act rates for the ‘kiddie tax’ is reinstated meaning that excess income will be taxed at a parent’s rate and not the trust and estate rates.
As mentioned, the most significant change under the SECURE Act is the elimination of the ability to stretch an inherited IRA (or 401(k) or 403(b)) with certain exceptions. The default rule now is that inherited IRAs must be fully distributed by the end of the 10th year following the death of the account owner. For example, if an account owner dies in 2020, leaving his or her IRA to a named beneficiary (who is not one of the defined exceptions), all monies from that IRA must be distributed by the end of 2030. The prior rule allowed beneficiaries to use their life expectancy to determine any required payout.
There are a few exceptions to this new default rule. Individuals who are permitted to stretch the inherited retirement account over their lifetime include:
The surviving spouse of the account holder.
A child of the account holder who has not yet reached the age of majority (in most jurisdictions, age 18). However, once the child reaches the age of majority, the default rule of 10 years kicks in.
Disabled individuals (which does include special needs trusts for such disabled individuals).
A chronically ill individual.
An individual who is not more than 10 years younger than the account holder.
The result of the new default rule for those who do not fall into an exempt category is that there will be less tax-deferred growth in the retirement account and an increase in income taxes because the rate of withdrawal has been accelerated.
There are some strategies available, which will be explained in more detail in later articles, that could help mitigate the increased tax liability. Those strategies include:
Qualified charitable distribution (“QCD”) – For those charitably inclined, an individual who is more than 70 ½ could make a gift directly to a charity by way of a QCD from his or her IRA. Such gifts are limited to $100,000 per year.
Charitable Remainder Trusts (“CRTs”) – Again for those charitably inclined, using a CRT may be an option to provide an income to a beneficiary during a specified time with a charity or charities receiving the remainder once the time period has passed.
Roth conversions – Much discussion is being had about individuals reviewing whether converting their tax-deferred IRAs to Roth IRAs is appropriate, which would alleviate the concern that beneficiaries will receive a huge tax bill.
Life insurance – Individuals may want to consider withdrawals from an IRA to pay premiums on a life insurance policy that instead could be left to their designated beneficiary tax free.
These strategies are heavily dependent on the specific circumstances faced by each IRA account holder and should be reviewed carefully.
Lastly, for many who have had their estate planning prepared, that plan may be structured around a revocable living trust with the revocable living trust being designated as the beneficiary of the IRA. As a result, those beneficiary designations and the terms of the trust need to be revisited as unintended income tax consequences may result because of the new 10 year default payout rule.
As for next steps, if you haven’t reviewed your beneficiary designations and your estate plan recently, you should consult with your team of professional advisors who can help explore the options available to you based on your situation. #estateplanning #SECUREAct #taxplanning @bgnthebgn @OFPLAW
(h/t to my colleague,David A. Lawrence, Esq. who recently attended the Annual Virginia Tax Roundtable and provided the summary below.)
It’s time, once again, to share some of the tidbits that I gleaned from
the Annual Virginia Tax Roundtable. Each year, a small group of
Virginia tax lawyers convenes to meet with the Virginia Tax
Commissioner, his staff, and the Attorney General’s staff to talk about
what the Tax Department is thinking, the challenges that they are
facing, and ideas for improved tax administration in Virginia.
In addition to responding to changes ushered in by the 2017 Tax Act, Virginia taxpayers and tax preparers should take note of several new and existing factors that could complicate your tax filing efforts.
Identity Theft & Refund Fraud Continues at High Levels
rise in fraudulent refund filings remains a big issue for the Tax Department,
and the additional scrutiny required to identify those cases continue to slow
processing of Virginia tax returns. The
good news: the Department believes it is
catching more of these fraudulent filings before checks are issued; it denied
more than $32 million in fraudulent 2017 refunds just through October 21, 2018
of this year.
More Retirements & Staffing Challenges
State is continued to be challenged by the retirements of long experienced tax
examiners, and they are trying to hire new examiners as quickly as
possible. Particularly hard hit has been
compliance field audit personnel in Northern Virginia and Tidewater.
of audits, the Tax Department engaged an outside consultant to help it be more
proactive in its compliance and audit activities. It is considering expanding reviews of
Schedule A deductions and Schedule C deductions. Further, the agency has lots of federal
return data, as well as data from other federal programs. Now, according to the Commissioner, the state
just needs a better, more efficient way to use that data for compliance and
audits. Note that fewer appeals are
coming to the Tax Department, and the Tax Department particularly hates dealing
with tax appeals from local jurisdictions.
2017 Tax Act – A Great Revenue Windfall for Virginia
changes made by the federal 2017 Tax Legislation are projected to give a
windfall of additional tax revenue to Virginia from individual filers. The General Assembly loves the extra revenue,
as long as it is not blamed for raising taxes.
There may be some proposals this year in the General Assembly to
increase Virginia’s standard deduction, increase the personal exemption, and/or
permit Virginia itemizing for an individual even if that individual took the federal
standard deduction. There have not been
many inquiries from the Legislature to the Tax Commissioner on the business
side of the 2017 Tax Act. It is expected
that some type of federal conformity, with exceptions, will be in place by mid-February
2019 effective for 2018 and onward.
of the biggest windfalls for the State is the fact that if more individuals use
the federal standard deduction, they are currently required to use the Virginia
standard deduction, which is very low.
Furthermore, for those who do itemize, the repeal and limitation of
those itemizable deductions also produces more revenue for Virginia. Finally, the limitations on loss deductions,
net interest deductions, and NOL deductions produce additional revenue for
Virginia. On the other hand, Virginia
loses revenue with the increased Section 179 Expensing and the fact that more
“small” businesses will be able to use the cash method of accounting.
Registering with the SCC Triggers Virginia Tax Filings for Businesses
Department confirmed that if a non-Virginia corporation or entity registers
with the Virginia SCC as a foreign entity, it automatically must start filing
Virginia income tax returns, even if it has no income.
Department keeps pumping out lots of rulings on Virginia residents versus
non-residents for taxation purposes.
They are all fact specific, and make it difficult for former residents
to be treated as non-Virginia tax residents when they continue to maintain ties
to Virginia after they have left the state (particularly if they try to leave
the State just prior to the year in which a large sale transaction occurs).
A Brave New World in Collecting Sales Tax from Out of State Businesses – the Wayfair Decision
U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in Wayfair this past year effectively overturned
the requirement for “physical presence” in order for a state to subject nonresident
businesses to collect sales taxes for other states.
a result of the Court’s decision, if a business had a physical presence in a state,
then that state may still require that business to collect and pay sales tax on
sales made into that state. Additionally,
states that have statutes similar to the one at issue in Wayfair, where an out-of-state
business has numerous sales into a state (either in raw numbers of transactions
or in the amount of dollars), then that state may now require those out-of-state
sellers to collect and pay sales tax on sales made into that state.
has not acted yet to implement the Wayfair decision, but most other states have
acted with various thresholds. This
revenue raiser will likely be added to this coming General Assembly’s
legislative calendar. As an example of
taxable nexus, the Wayfair situation subjected a company to collect and pay
sales taxes to a state where the company had either at least $100k in sales or
at least 200 transactions in that State.
This will have a big impact on internet sellers, software sellers, and other “free shipping” product sales. A future question raised by the Wayfair case is whether states will try to use it to expand that ruling into the income tax and local tax area. The Supreme Court used old “income tax” nexus cases as part of its logic in support of the Wayfair decision. So expect more to come.